I always find repairs a little bothersome.
Modern repairs can often be masterpieces that are virtually
impossible to detect. Regrettably, sometimes those repairs lead to
deception; kind of like forgetting to tell the buyer of your slick
1968 car that you turned the odometer back to zero a few years ago.
Many older repairs done with inferior materials, like adhesive tape,
and sloppy workmanship, are often clearly evident.
Back when nonfederal paper money wasn’t worth a whole lot,
“conservators” used to cannibalize vignettes and other elements from
more common notes that were only used for parts; extracting
replacement portraits, borders, counters and the like.
If the replacements weren’t quite right, well, it was the thought
that counted, right? The purpose of a repair was often simply to keep
a note from disintegrating and allow it to remain in circulation a bit
longer. Notes from “good” banks were patched with various materials,
sometimes literally sewn together with needle and thread. Seldom was
any deception associated with repairs from this period. Sometimes the
outcome is even amusing.
Take, for example, the case of the note shown above. Early issues of
the branches of the State Bank of Ohio had the issuing branch’s name
written in. As a note wore in circulation, it often became almost
impossible to tie back to the issuing branch, because the handwritten
information faded (or it was indecipherable to begin with).
In 1851, the bank solved this problem by requiring the new designs to
have the branch names and locations printed on both the face and back
of each note.
In this case, the would-be conservator had two half notes that he
joined together, none too carefully, with a paper strap and some glue.
The resulting note seemed to be an issue of the “Miami County branch
of Massillon.” The only thing is, there was no such bank branch.
The repairman joined the left half of a $1 note from the Miami County
branch of Troy, Ohio, with the right half of the same design from the
Union County branch of Massillon, Ohio. As a result, I usually say
that the note is either from “Troyillon” or “Massiroy.”
I’ve always wondered what would have happened if this note had been
presented for redemption at either of those two branches.
Wendell Wolka has been a paper money collector and educator for more
than 40 years. If you have questions or suggestions, you can email him