A hoard of gold coins found in the Netherlands in 2016 has recently
come to light.
In 2016, treasure hunters discovered 23 gold coins from the late
Roman Empire in an orchard in Lienden, in the Dutch province of Gelderland.
The gold solidi were struck in the late fourth and fifth centuries.
Connect with Coin World:
up for our free eNewsletter
Like us on
us on Twitter
The Lienden treasure is the largest known solidus treasure from the
Netherlands and represents the latest issue of Roman coins that
circulated in the Netherlands, having been buried around 460 A.D.
The treasure serves as a unique document of the transition from
Roman times to early Middle Ages and marks the end of Roman authority
in southern Netherlands.
It may have also been buried in a tomb hill from the Bronze Age,
which would add additional significance.
The treasure find marks one of the first instances where the
Netherlands’ new system for documenting treasures was employed.
In 2016, the Portable Antiquities of the Netherlands system, PAN,
was launched by Vrije Universiteit as a means for recording
archaeological findings made by private individuals searching with
Officials confirmed that two searchers in 2012 had located eight
gold coins at the same site when the area was plowed to allow planting
of the orchard.
Through additional research, officials determined that a number of
gold coins were found in the same site in the 1840s.
The 2016 discovery brings the total of known pieces located at the
site to 42 coins, but surely others exist that are unknown, according
to Stijn Heeren, the coordinator of Portable Antiquities of the Netherlands.
The coins were issued from 375 to 457, and the treasure was
reportedly buried around 460, just 16 years before the western Roman
Constantinus III, who reigned from 407 to 411, is the
most-represented ruler in the hoard, with 12 coins from his tenure.
Context of the hoard
After being alerted to the 2016 find, archaeologists with the Vrije
Universiteit and the Rijksdienst for the Cultural Heritage excised a
small excavation at the same spot, attempting to determine if more
coins or jewelry was at the site.
Additionally, searchers hoped to determine whether the coins had
been buried in a jar, pouch or other container, and in what context
the treasure was buried, in a house or with a person. The latter
scenario was a possibility, because the finder of the 2016 treasure
also located human bones near the coins.
The archaeologists failed to find additional coins, or jewelry, or
evidence of a pottery or metal container, suggesting that the treasure
was hidden in a pouch (long since disintegrated).
Unburned bone fragments from three distinct humans were located at
the site, as well as a cremation grave with an urn. In a development
that surprised archaeologists, some of the bones were carbon-dated to
circa 1800 B.C., meaning there was no relation between the bones and
the coin hoard.
The cremated remains are much younger, probably from the Iron Age.
Evidence suggests that the site was once on the outskirts of a
settlement, and that it could have been a burial mound.
If that were the case, the identifiable hill would explain why the
site was chosen for secreting the hoard by someone who had hopes to
locate and retrieve it later
The treasure of Lienden must be understood within the context of
gradual disintegration of the western Roman empire in the fifth
century, according to Stijn Heeren.
The increasing dependence on Germanic groups in the region,
including the Franks, played an important role in this regard.
Lowest mintage American Eagle, a counterfeit
1902-O Morgan dollar struck to circulate:
Another column in the July 10 Coin World examines a “ghostly”
Kennedy half dollar
Roman emperors could have paid the Frankish leaders with the gold
coins in exchange for their military support during the late fourth
century. Those leaders could then distribute the coins under their own authority.
The latest find aligns with earlier treasure knowledge in the
Netherlands. Much of the gold coin hoards previously discovered were
located north, south and west of the Rhine River.
The spread of these gold discoveries reflects final attempts by
Roman authorities to control the Maas and Rhine Valley, attempts which
relied upon an extremely late influx of Roman gold.
That influx can be explained by the relationship between Emperor
Majorianus and Aegidius, an Anglo-Gallic leader in Gaul under the emperor.
Aegidius supported Majorianus, who was deposed by Ricimer, at which
point Aegidius began waging war against the Visigoths. Aegidius
refused to work with Ricimer and soon faced allies of Ricimer who
forced him to retreat to an area around Paris where Aegidius formed an
independent Gallo-Roman Empire called Soissons.
In 463, with the assistance of Frankish allies under the leadership
of Childerik, Aegidius defeated the Visigoths in battle at Orléans.
Aegidius likely used the discovered coins to pay his Frankish allies,
according to Heeren.
The next year Aegidius was poisoned, but the kingdom he had founded
continued until it was taken in 486 by the Franks under Clovis.
According to Heeren, the Dutch approach to found treasure is quite
similar to the United Kingdom’s (which also has what it calls a
Portable Antiquities Scheme), although there is no treasure trove law
in the Netherlands.
In the United Kingdom, handing over important finds (for money in
return) is mandatory, and the declaration of other finds for
scientific recording is voluntary. In The Netherlands, declaration of
all finds is mandatory — all finds must be shown to archaeologists.
After that, the finder and owner of the property share the value, and
they can either keep or sell the find at will; there is no obligation
to sell the treasure to museums as required in the United Kingdom.
In the current case, all the finders followed all the rules, plus
they offered all the finds to a museum for at least five years (they
may sell later). The owner of the property and the finders contributed
to an excavation.
Full details of the system can be found online at a dedicated website.