Collectors prize contemporary counterfeit Morgan dollars that passed as genuine with apparent ease

About VAMS column from the May 26, 2014, issue of Coin World
By , Special to Coin World
Published : 05/09/14
Text Size

The Top 100 Morgan Dollar Varieties: The VAM Keys by Michael Fey and Jeff Oxman lists some of the series’ most desirable pieces.

Three of its listings have achieved a level of notoriety after it was discovered they are contemporary counterfeits. The spurious dollars dated 1896, 1900 and 1902 all share a “Micro O” Mint mark used for genuine issues in other years.

I recently had the opportunity to examine a well-preserved VAM-3 1902-O Morgan dollar. Its description in the Comprehensive Catalog and Encyclopedia of Morgan & Peace Dollars by Leroy Van Allen and A. George Mallis notes the abnormally small Mint mark along with a reverse hub type that was replaced in 1900. Seeing the piece now, its nature seems obvious with the benefit of hindsight.

Of course, that’s a luxury that’s never available at the onset of any new research. The counterfeits passed as dollars at face value with apparent ease, as most examples are heavily circulated. The wear of commerce hid the telltale flaws for decades.

Although some suspicions were raised earlier, only in 2005 was conclusive proof presented. Studying a group of higher grade examples, Mike Faraone at Professional Coin Grading Service found matching and repeating depressions on multiple examples.

Further research by Van Allen uncovered that the reverse used for all three dates was copied from an VAM-6 1899-O dollar. His booklet Micro O and Other Counterfeit Morgan and Peace Dollars also describes a growing family of die linked issues now unmasked. The scale of the operation had gone undetected for perhaps a century. We don’t know exactly when they were produced, but it’s a reasonable assumption that they were all made around the same time.

A few months ago, a collector showed me a VAM-4 1896-O Morgan dollar with the date 1905 crudely carved into its obverse.

The coin showed signs of circulating after suffering the graffiti. It’s hardly proof, but suggests the fakes were made shortly after the dates from which they were copied.

You are signed in as:null

Please sign in or join to share your thoughts on this story

No comments yet