While this column focuses primarily on U.S. coins, it’s sometimes
necessary to go further afield, as certain error types are found only
among foreign issues.
For error collectors focused on pattern and process, national
boundaries are irrelevant. Unusual world errors are not only
instructive in illuminating the outer reaches of minting malfunctions,
but they prepare the mind to eventually recognize similar errors among
Several previous columns presented a diversity of die subsidence
(sunken die) errors in U.S. coins (April 4, April 11, June 20, and
Aug. 29, 2011, Collectors’ Clearinghouse columns; March 12 and Sept.
17, 2012, columns). When abnormally soft die steel sinks in, it leaves
a corresponding bulge on the coins it strikes.
Die subsidence errors can affect the entire die face or be quite
localized. They may be associated with cracking or splitting of the
die face. When present, these cracks can skirt, encircle or penetrate
the zone of subsidence. This effect is seen on the illustrated 2003-D
Roosevelt dime, on which two radial die cracks disappear into a large,
centralized zone of subsidence.
I’ve encountered one manifestation of die subsidence on only the
obverse face of stainless steel India 25-paise coins produced in 1995.
(This denomination carries the image of the great one-horned Indian
rhinoceros on its reverse face, which is typically struck by the
hammer die. Inaugurated in 1985, this design — along with the
denomination — was retired in 2011.) Over the years I’ve acquired
three examples that display softly defined ridges that faithfully
follow the course of associated die cracks. These ridges correspond to
low valleys in the die face that represent zones of subsidence.
Our first 1995 25-paise coin shows a long rim-to-rim die crack (or
possibly two contiguous die cracks) on the left side of the obverse
face, which was struck by the anvil die.
The lower half of the crack is of the conventional sort,
characterized by a narrow, sharply defined raised line with a somewhat
jagged trajectory. The upper half of the crack is hard to characterize
as it is largely obscured by ridge development. Three additional die
cracks extend in from the edge of the coin to the main crack.
In this example, ridge development seems largely confined to the
lateral side of the long die crack. The reverse face has a small cud
(marginal die break) above the date.
Our next 1995 25-paise coin was struck off center. It shows a
long, rim-to-rim, bilevel (stepped) die crack on the right side.
Bilevel die cracks are characterized by vertical displacement instead
of lateral spread. A blunt ridge runs along the medial margin of the
bilevel die crack. A short conventional die crack extends in from the
coin’s edge to the main crack.
Our last and most dramatic example was struck off center with its
right side resting on top of a stiff collar. The obverse face was
struck by a shattered anvil die. Many of the intersecting die cracks
are bilevel, while a few are of the conventional sort. Most of the
cracks run within, and are sometimes obscured by, the now-familiar
blunt ridges. One low, straight ridge cuts obliquely across the number
25 and doesn’t appear to be accompanied by a die crack in the middle
of its course.
The formation of these linear zones of subsidence cannot simply be
chalked up to the rigors of striking steel planchets. This issue was
produced for 26 years and the phenomenon doesn’t appear in any other
year. The equally hard, stainless steel Indian 50-paise coin never
suffered from this problem. And, of course, the U.S. 1943 Lincoln
zinc-coated steel cent planchets didn’t cause their dies to cave in.
The die steel used for these small coins in 1995 must have had a
problem. Perhaps the wrong type of steel was selected, or perhaps the
rod of die steel was sloppily forged, leaving it with too many
contaminants or internal flaws. Perhaps faulty annealing, tempering or
quenching was at fault. As to why only the anvil die is affected, I
haven’t a clue.
Whether the valleys in the die face appear before, after or
simultaneous with the development of the die cracks is not entirely
clear. It’s quite possible the developmental sequence is variable.
Coin World’s Collectors’ Clearinghouse department does not accept
coins or other items for examination without prior permission
News Editor William T. Gibbs. Materials sent to
Clearinghouse without prior permission will be returned unexamined.
Please address all Clearinghouse inquiries to email@example.com
or to 800-673-8311, Ext. 172.
How to contact Collectors’ Clearinghouse