Legislation is now pending in Congress that would expand the Hobby
Protection Act to cover sales of replica numismatic items that violate
the act, and also afford greater trademark protection to grading
The amendment seeks to strengthen the act was introduced in
response to the growing concern about the proliferation of counterfeit
U.S. coins produced in China, or anywhere else, and sold in the United States.
Counterfeit grading service slabs are also being produced in China
and sold into the U.S. market.
The legislation, H.R. 5977, would amend the Hobby Protection Act
to make it a violation of the act for someone to assist or support
“any manufacturer, importer, or seller if that person knows or
consciously avoids knowing that the manufacturer, importer, or seller
is engaged in any act or practice” that violates specific subsections
of the act.
While the Hobby Protection Act currently sets forth civil
penalties for the manufacture and importation of counterfeit coins,
“H.R. 5977 amends the Hobby Protection Act to include the sale of
counterfeit coins in the prohibitions and to expand the federal venue
and remedies available to victims of this counterfeiting under the
Act,” according to a staffer with the Judiciary Committee.
Attorney and Coin World columnist Armen R. Vartian notes
that the Hobby Protection Act “does not punish the actual sale of such
items in the United States.”
Collectors and dealers have reported the sale of counterfeit coins
manufactured in China through online auction sites, flea markets and
other venues, though few criminal prosecutions have been brought
against the sellers under counterfeiting laws.
Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, introduced H.R. 5977, the Collectible
Coin Protection Act, on June 20.
The co-sponsor is Rep. Fred Upton, D-Michigan, chairman of the
House Energy and Commerce Committee. The legislation was referred to
Upton’s committee for review. Lamar is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Currently the Hobby Protection Act regulates the manufacture of
reproductions of numismatic and political replicas, including copies
of such items as Colonial coins, pioneer gold coins and paper money.
Such replicas must be marked with the word “copy” on one side.
The new legislation, in addition to making it a violation of the
act to aid those making, importing or selling unmarked numismatic
replicas, would also add a section to the act on trademark violations
regarding the “unauthorized use of registered trademarks belonging to
a collectibles certification service,” which is defined in the
legislation as “a person recognized by collectors for providing
independent certification that collectible items are genuine.”
That would extend enforcement to fake coin encapsulation holders
bearing the logos of legitimate coin grading services.
The legislation would have to be approved by Congress and signed
by President Obama before it could become law.
Hobby support sought
The legislation would “provide needed ‘teeth’ for the Hobby
Protection Act by adding language clearly and specifically targeting”
manufacturers, importers, or sellers of counterfeit items — expanding
the act beyond distribution to sales and marketing, according to a
news release from the Industry Council for Tangible Assets Inc.
“Although a few private lawsuits have been fought over Chinese
counterfeits with some success, law enforcement and plaintiffs have
been discouraged by the limited rights and remedies available to them
under the Hobby Protection Act,” according to ICTA.
Beginnings of act
Congress approved the Hobby Protection Act on Nov. 29, 1973. The
act currently requires manufacturers and importers of “imitation
political items,” defined as “an item which purports to be, but in
fact is not, an original numismatic item or which is a reproduction,
copy, or counterfeit of an original numismatic item,” to mark such
items “plainly and permanently” with the word “copy.”
The act designated the Federal Trade Commission to develop
regulations regarding how the marking would be carried out. The FTC
issued its Rules and Regulations in 1975 under the Hobby Protection
Act. Those rules established the sizes and dimensions of the letters
and numerals to be used as well as the location of the markings.
The rule was amended in 1988 to provide additional guidance on the
minimum size of letters for the word “copy” as a proportion of the
diameter of the coin reproductions.
According to the FTC, before the 1988 amendment, “if the coin were
too small to comply with the minimum letter size requirements, the
manufacturer or importer had to individually request from the
commission a variance from those requirements.”
Because imitation miniature coins were becoming more common, the
FTC decided to allow the word “copy” on miniature imitation coins “in
sizes that could be reduced proportionally with the size of the item.”
Call to action
“The most effective approach to stopping the flow into the U.S.
market of counterfeit coins from China would be to add force to the
existing Hobby Protection Act,” according to ICTA.
ICTA is calling on dealers and collectors in the rare coin,
currency and precious metals hobby to contact their member of Congress
and urge them to support H.R. 5977.
The legislation is considered by supporters as “revenue neutral”
so there is no political downside for members of Congress, according
To find your member of the U.S. House of Representatives visit the
website www.house.gov and follow