While all the publicity concerning the announcement that a woman will be depicted on the new $10 Federal
Reserve note was expected, the reactions to it took many by surprise.
While opining that having a woman on a note was a good idea, former Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke
used the word “appalled” to describe his reaction to the possibility
that Alexander Hamilton’s position would be diminished. Yet in a
recent USA Today/Suffolk poll only 4 percent of respondents said the
$10 bill should stay the way it is. As for the woman of choice: 8
percent favored Eleanor Roosevelt, 5 percent Rosa Parks, 4 percent
Harriet Tubman, and 3 percent Susan B. Anthony. Sixty-six percent were
undecided or unsure.
The new bill seems to have become something of an issue. This, coupled with the
recent story on Hong Kong’s new commemorative $150 note, and the
successful introduction of commemorative paper money issues in
countries too numerous to mention, gives pause for thought.
Maybe those resistant to change and those wanting change can both be
kept happy by an idea that seems radical at first, but hardly is at
all. Why can’t the United States issue commemorative notes of its own?
It can’t be said that something similar hasn’t been done before.
Perhaps the issue was not officially called “commemorative,” but the
Series 1976 $2 Federal Reserve note was precisely that. It was issued
on the occasion of the Bicentennial, and the back design of John
Trumbull’s painting of the signing of the Declaration of Independence
was no coincidence.
Going back to the preceding century, although they were circulating
silver certificates, the Educational Series of 1896 did nothing if not
“commemorate” the progress of the last half of the 19th century. What
about William Windom, who died in January 1891 and appears on the $2
silver certificates of 1891, or Thomas A. Hendricks, vice president
when he died in 1885 and subject of the $10 silver certificate of 1886?
So it can be done and has been done. Would it be confusing to have
different designs of the same denomination circulate side-by-side? Not
at all. The above notes circulated simultaneously with at least
several other designs of the same denomination, as was the case
throughout the large-size note era.
What do Coin World’s readers think?
More from CoinWorld.com:
standard .900 silver alloy in coins may change under legislation
demand for sets frustrating to Mint’s customers
Mint reports 2015 Truman Coin and Chronicles Set sold out within
Mint temporarily suspends sales July 7 of American Eagle silver
completes melting of gold coin hoard
Keep up with all of CoinWorld.com's news and insights by signing
up for our free eNewsletters, liking
us on Facebook, and following us on Twitter. We're also on Instagram!